Here are some advices on how to conduct a good review
Double blinded process: As the journal policy is a double blinded, please note that there will be no details of author in the first page of manuscript. Both the reviewer and the author are anonymous to each other. So never to worry because the authors details are missing.
Start with the importance and novelty of the work. If the work is flawed but salvageable, write in the review form what needs to be done to rescue the paper. This is helpful to the Editor, the authors and to science in general.
List your comments in two groups: Comments to the author and comments to the editor/editorial office. Mark that require additional experiments, analyses, rewriting etc. Do quote the points like linguistic, grammar, typographical, illustrations, editing, etc which enhance the presentation of the work.
Recognition - We publish a complete list of reviewers on the website once you complete and submit the review.
Certificates for completed reviews are available upon request.
If time is critical and if you want your results to be published as soon as possible, we have the policy to expedite the review process. The current average times for the journals are:- submission to first decision - 16 days and submission to final decision - 30 days.
Stroke Emergency Campaign
Some brain regions (indicated in red), lost irreversibly
More time lapses, more brain tissue dies. Treat urgently
Treatment at this time may result in moderate disability
Without treatment until this time lead to severe disability